1 The retractions came only weeks after BioMed Central.


But these addresses were ones he created, so the requests to review went right to him or his colleagues. The fallout from Moon’s confession: 28 content articles in various journals released by Informa had been retracted, and one editor resigned. An editor at among the journals released by Sage Publications became suspicious, sparking a comprehensive and lengthy investigation, in July 2014 which led to the retraction of 60 articles. At the final end of 2014, BioMed Central and other publishers alerted the international Committee on Publication Ethics to new forms of systematic attempts to manipulate journals’ peer-review procedures. According to a declaration published on COPE’s website in January 2015, these efforts to hijack the scholarly review system were evidently orchestrated by organizations that first helped authors write or enhance their scientific articles and sold them favorable peer evaluations.4 BioMed Central conducted a comprehensive investigation of all their recently published content and identified 43 that were published based on testimonials from fabricated reviewers.In both cases, the difference had not been significant. In the cytokine-refractory establishing, median PFS was 8.1 months and 8.4 months in younger and older patients, respectively, and median OS was a corresponding 20.2 months and 15.8 months. Again, there was no significant difference between your two age ranges. These were more likely significantly, however, to experience fatigue , cough , peripheral oedema , anaemia , decreased hunger and thrombocytopenia . Licensed from medwireNews with permission from Springer Health care Ltd. All rights reserved. Neither of these ongoing parties endorse or suggest any commercial products, services, or equipment.

ACC gives comments in response to BPA study on children The American Chemistry Council supplies the following comments in response to queries regarding a study by Joe M.