1 The retractions came only a few months after BioMed Central.


It really is unclear what motivated the guest editors to activate in such fraud, nor offers it been determined if the authors of the manuscripts included participated in the deception at all. There are several lessons to be learned from these instances of peer-review and peer-reviewer fraud. One is usually that the electronic manuscript-handling systems that a lot of journals make use of are as vulnerable to exploitation and hacking as various other data systems. Moon and Chen, for instance, both abused a feature of ScholarOne: the e-mail messages delivered to scholars inviting them to examine a manuscript include log-in information, and whoever receives those messages can sign into the system.Waldman said. We also believe this can be get over using molecular analyses in comparison to routine pathological analyses. Dr. Waldman and his group will carry out a retrospective analysis comparing the results of African-American patients and Caucasian patients identified as having early-stage colorectal cancer. They will look at the utility of using GUCY2C as a adjustable to identify occult metastases in the lymph nodes, and observe how the tumor burden of GUCY2C compares between Caucasian and African-American individuals.

A more accurate method for measuring blood degrees of endothelial progenitor cells A more accurate method for measuring blood levels of specialized cells that circulate in the bloodstream and fix harm to the arterial lining has been discovered simply by Duke University Medical Center cardiologists.